In Sickness & In Wealth
The Conservative policy on tax breaks for married couples may well prove to be inconsequential by the time we get to the election (ever more likely to be May), but I find it one of the most irksome policies of any of the three main parties. Tory thinking, informed by the work of former Tory leader Ian Duncan Smith, seems to be:
Social breakdown is bad – A good deal of social breakdown is caused by family breakdown – We need stable families as they produce the best outcomes for kids and minimise social breakdown – Evidence shows that married couples provide the most stable family structure – We need to support marriage, so lets give them a tax break.
I have always thought that the thinking here is very flawed. Are stable relationships the result of marriage, or that people that are already in committed stable relationships tend to be the kind of people who get married? It should not be surprised that married couples provide the most stable family units; by virtue of the fact they have normally survived or not been subject to the normal ravages that have prised apart other couples. Although we do not have the details of the tax proposal yet, it also seems strange that a married couple without kids should get a tax break, whilst a cohabiting couple with kids would not. I know tax is all about these types of choices, but those anomolies it throws run contrary to both the stated intent of the policy and the need for fiscal responsibility that the Tories have been stressing.
As much as we possibly can we should try to minimise governments interferance in peoples personal relationships; by all means eradicate the elements of the tax and benefit system that penalise married couples compared to those who cohabit, but lets not swing in the other direction hey? We need to make sure we support all those families providing a loving and nurturing environment for their kids, not just the ones that decided to get married. Here is an excellent blog post at the Financial Times that explains why the policy is incoherent and fiscally reckless.



























